1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 67 Ohio
  5. 67 Ohio St.3d 152 (1993)
 

STATE EX REL. HAMBLIN v. CITY OF BROOKLYN

No. 91-1773.

67 Ohio St.3d 152 (1993)

THE STATE EX REL. HAMBLIN, APPELLANT, v. CITY OF BROOKLYN ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided August 18, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James Kura, Ohio Public Defender, Kathleen A McGarry and Dale A. Baich, for appellant.

Thomas F. O'Malley, Law Director; Stephanie Tubbs Jones, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Carol Shockley, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellees.

Per Curiam.

We hold that the court of appeals did not abuse its discretion in finding particular witness statements to be exempt trial preparation materials under R.C. 149.43(A)(4) or in finding certain forensic documents to be exempt investigatory work product, R.C. 149.43(A)(2)(c).

Here, the court of appeals performed the mandated individualized scrutiny of the records. See State ex rel. Natl. Broadcasting Co. v. Cleveland (1988),

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases