1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 865 P.2d
  5. 865 P.2d 1329 (1993)
 

ROSEBURG FOREST PRODUCTS v. ROWE

WCB 91-08657; CA A80060.

865 P.2d 1329 (1993)

125 Or. App. 580

In the Matter of the Compensation of Wanda L. Rowe, Claimant. ROSEBURG FOREST PRODUCTS, Petitioner, v. Wanda L. ROWE, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 29, 1993.

Reconsideration Denied February 9, 1994.

Review Denied February 22, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

H. Scott Plouse, Medford, argued the cause for petitioner. On the brief were Adam T. Stamper and Cowling & Heysell.

David C. Force, Eugene, argued the cause and filed the brief, for respondent.

Before WARREN, P.J., and EDMONDS and LANDAU, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

In this worker's compensation case, claimant made a claim for an occupational disease, which she described as "[w]orking over number of year [sic], numbness, tingling, ect [sic] on putty machine for 17 years." She described the nature of the disease as "carpel [sic] tunnel." The referee concluded that the condition was not compensable. On review, the Board reversed, holding that claimant's "upper extremity" condition was compensable...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases