IN RE ZIEGLER

No. 91-1430.

992 F.2d 1197 (1993)

In re Karl ZIEGLER and Heinz Martin.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Rehearing Denied; Suggestion for Rehearing Declined June 29, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arnold Sprung, Sprung, Horn, Kramer & Woods, Tarrytown, NY, argued for appellants. With him on the brief were Nathaniel D. Kramer and Alan J. Grant.

Fred E. McKelvey, Sol., Arlington, VA, argued for appellee. With him on the brief was Adriene B. Lepiane.

Paul E. Crawford and George Pazuniak, Connolly, Bove, Lodge & Hutz, Wilmington, DE, were on the brief, for amicus curiae, Aristech Chemical Corp.

Kenneth E. Madsen, Kenyon & Kenyon, New York City, was on the brief, for amicus curiae, Himont, Inc. Also on the brief was James Galbraith, of counsel.

Before NIES, Chief Judge, ARCHER, Circuit Judge, and COHN, District Judge.


Rehearing Denied; Suggestion for Rehearing In Banc Declined June 29, 1993.

ARCHER, Circuit Judge.

Karl Ziegler and Heinz Martin (together Ziegler) appeal from the June 10, 1991 decision of the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (board), sustaining the rejection of claims 37 and 38, the only claims remaining in United States patent application Serial No. 07/108,524, filed October 15, 1987 as a continuation of United...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases