1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 991 F.2d
  5. 991 F.2d 1188 (1993)
 

U.S. v. McFARLEY

No. 92-5555.

991 F.2d 1188 (1993)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daryl Bernard McFARLEY, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Decided April 20, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mauricio Dominguez, Charlotte, NC, argued, for defendant-appellant.

Harry Thomas Church, Asst. U.S. Atty., Charlotte, NC, argued (Thomas J. Ashcraft, U.S. Atty., on brief), for plaintiff-appellee.

Before WIDENER, HALL, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge:

We are here presented with the single issue of whether Charlotte (North Carolina) police officers violated Daryl Bernard McFarley's Fourth Amendment rights when they stopped him and detained his luggage to allow a dog trained to detect narcotics to sniff it. The dog's positive "alert" provided the basis on which a search warrant was issued and the luggage opened, revealing 450 grams of cocaine powder and 243 grams of crack...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases