HOHMAN v. BARTEL

91CV120; CA A77153.

865 P.2d 1301 (1993)

125 Or. App. 306

Michael and Nora HOHMAN, husband and wife, Roger Lauen and Jane McCotter, Appellants, v. Royce M. BARTEL and Mary Bartel, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 15, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Christopher Keusink argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs was Clayton Patrick.

George W. Kelly argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief was Stephen Eichelberger.

Before WARREN, P.J., and EDMONDS and LANDAU, JJ.


EDMONDS, Judge.

Plaintiffs brought this action seeking a declaratory judgment and an injunction to prevent defendants from building a house on defendants' land. Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment that denied their claims for relief. On de novo review, ORS 19.125(3), we reverse.

The dispute in this case involves oceanfront property in Brookings. In 1964, Archie and Florence Anderson owned three adjoining lots: Lot 201, the most northerly lot; Lot 204...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases