1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 131 N.J.
  5. 131 N.J. 84 (1993)
 

STATE v. ZENQUIS

131 N.J. 84 (1993)

618 A.2d 335

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT AND CROSS-RESPONDENT, v. LUIS D. ZENQUIS, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT AND CROSS-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided January 21, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark E. Bailey, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant and cross-respondent (Robert J. Del Tufo, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).

Steven J. Fram, Designated Counsel, argued the cause for respondent and cross-appellant (Zulima V. Farber, Public Defender, attorney).

Gerald Krovatin argued the cause for amicus curiae, Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers of New Jersey (Lowenstein, Sandler, Kohl, Fisher & Boylan, attorneys).

The opinion of the Court was delivered by CLIFFORD, J.

In the companion case, State v. Garcia, 131 N.J. 67, 618 A.2d 326 (1992), decided this day, we hold that Evidence Rule 34 provides a "surveillance location privilege" that permits the State, in appropriate circumstances, to conceal information about the location from which law-enforcement personnel...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases