1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 845 P.2d
  5. 845 P.2d 1284 (1993)
 

MOSER v. FROHNMAYER

CC 89C-12416; CA A67796; SC S39367.

845 P.2d 1284 (1993)

315 Or. 372

Ronald MOSER, Respondent on Review, v. David B. FROHNMAYER, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Oregon, and the State of Oregon, Petitioners on Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided February 19, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rives Kistler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for petitioners on review. With him on the petition were Charles S. Crookham, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Charles F. Hinkle, Portland, argued the cause and filed the response for respondent on review.

PETERSON, Justice.

Article I, section 8, of the Oregon Constitution, provides that "[n]o law shall be passed restraining the free expression of opinion, or restricting the right to speak, write, or print freely on any subject whatever." The issue in this case is whether a law that prohibits the use of any "automatic dialing and announcing device to solicit the purchase of any realty, goods or services," ORS 759.290, violates...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases