PENNY LANE v. SUFFOLK COUNTY


191 A.D.2d 19 (1993)

In the Matter of Penny Lane/East Hampton, Inc., Petitioner, v. County of Suffolk et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

June 14, 1993


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rabinowitz, Boudin, Standard, Krinsky & Lieberman, P. C., New York City (Victor Rabinowitz and Ellen Winner of counsel), for petitioner.

Robert J. Cimino, County Attorney of Suffolk County, Hauppauge (Caroline Levy and Arline Z. Willing of counsel), for respondents.

SULLIVAN, J. P., O'BRIEN and COPERTINO, JJ., concur.


BALLETTA, J.

We are called upon in this case to determine whether a Suffolk County local law prohibiting the display of what is deemed to be obscene material is invalid as having been preempted by State obscenity laws. We now hold that a local government does not have the power to enact its own code governing obscenity, since the provisions of the New York State Penal Law and CPLR 6330 (which authorizes local...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases