1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 997 F.2d
  5. 997 F.2d 1076 (1993)
 

U.S. v. WINFIELD

Nos. 92-5457, 92-5466.

997 F.2d 1076 (1993)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roosevelt WINFIELD, a/k/a Jihad A. Muhammed, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Luvenia H. WINFIELD, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Decided June 29, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John Blanton Farmer, Thompson & McMullan, P.C., Richmond, VA, argued, for appellant Roosevelt Winfield.

Reginald Moore Barley, Richmond, VA, argued, for appellant Luvenia Winfield.

N. George Metcalf, Asst. U.S. Atty., Richmond, VA, argued (Richard Cullen, U.S. Atty., on the brief), for plaintiff-appellee.

Before WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge, SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge, and VOORHEES, Chief United States District Judge for the Western District of North Carolina, sitting by designation.

OPINION

SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge:

We review the convictions of Luvenia H. Winfield and her son, Roosevelt Winfield, for various crimes involving drugs proceeds. Both Luvenia and Roosevelt argue that the evidence produced at trial was insufficient to support their convictions under 18 U.S.C. § 371 and 31 U.S.C. §§ 5322 and 5324 for conspiracy to violate the currency transaction reporting ("CTR") requirements. Luvenia also argues that the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases