1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 985 F.2d
  5. 985 F.2d 1070 (1993)
 

MINDANA v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT

No. 92-3073.

985 F.2d 1070 (1993)

Simplicio D. MINDANA, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

February 5, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stuart M. Gerson, Asst. Atty. Gen., David M. Cohen, Director and John K. Lapiana, Atty., Commercial Litigation Branch, Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, were on the motion to reform caption.

Mary L. Jennings, Acting Gen. Counsel, David C. Kane, Asst. General Counsel and Calvin M. Morrow, Atty., Merit Systems Protection Bd., of Washington, DC, file opinion to the Office of Personnel Management's motion to reform caption. Sara B. Rearden, Atty., Merit Systems Protection Bd., of Washington, DC, filed a supplement to the opposition.

PLAGER, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) moves to reform the caption to designate itself as respondent. The Merit System Protection Board opposes.

The court previously stayed proceedings in this case pending a decision in a case with a related caption issue. See Spruill v. Merit Sys. Protection Bd., 978 F.2d 679 (Fed.Cir.1992). Spruill has now been decided. Accordingly,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases