LUNSFORD v. FARMERS INSURANCE COMPANY

9007-04008; CA A67556.

846 P.2d 1206 (1993)

118 Or. App. 308

Penny L. LUNSFORD, Appellant, v. FARMERS INSURANCE COMPANY OF OREGON, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided February 17, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ronald H. Elzinga, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. On the briefs was William D. Bailey, Portland.

Patrick N. Rothwell, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Hallmark, Keating & Abbott, P.C., Portland.

Before ROSSMAN, P.J., and DE MUNIZ and LEESON, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals a summary judgment dismissing her action against defendant for breach of an automobile insurance contract. We affirm.

Plaintiff was injured when the car she was driving collided with one driven by Peterson. Peterson was at fault. Plaintiff obtained a judgment against Peterson for $25,000. Because there were multiple claimants, plaintiff received only $17,500 of the $50,000 per accident limit on Peterson's liability insurance....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases