1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 859 P.2d
  5. 859 P.2d 1180 (1993)
 

HAMMON STATE LINE v. STINSON

89-16397; CA A75509.

859 P.2d 1180 (1993)

123 Or. App. 418

In the Matter of the Compensation of Curtis W. Stinson, Claimant. HAMMON STAGE LINE and Employers Insurance of Wausau, a Mutual Company, Petitioners-Cross-Respondents, v. Curtis W. STINSON, Respondent-Cross-Petitioner.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided September 29, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David O. Horne, Beaverton, argued the cause for petitioners-cross-respondents. With him on the brief was Wausau Insurance Companies, Beaverton.

Arthur Klosterman, Salem, argued the cause for respondent-cross-petitioner. With him on the brief was Whitehead & Klosterman, Salem.

Before WARREN, P.J., and EDMONDS and LANDAU, JJ.

LANDAU, Judge.

Employer petitions for review of an order of the Workers' Compensation Board that held that the doctrine of claim preclusion bars claimant from challenging the wage rate used to calculate his temporary total disability benefits, but not his permanent total disability benefits. Claimant cross-petitions for review of the same order.

Claimant was injured in an automobile accident on December 17, 1982. Employer accepted his workers' compensation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases