COX v. SAIF

91-09172; CA A77360.

855 P.2d 1165 (1993)

121 Or. App. 568

In the Matter of the Compensation of Ray C. Cox, Claimant. Ray C. COX, Petitioner, v. SAIF CORPORATION and Gregory Forest Products, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided July 14, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert F. Webber, Medford, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Black, Chapman & Webber, Medford.

Steven Cotton, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before ROSSMAN, P.J., and De MUNIZ and LEESON, JJ.


ROSSMAN, Presiding Judge.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers' Compensation Board affirming without opinion the referee's order that claimant's hypertension, diabetes and hyperlipidemia are not compensable. We agree with claimant that the Board erred in determining that the conditions are not compensable, and we reverse and remand for reconsideration.

In an unappealed order of March 29, 1989, a referee held that claimant's hypertension, diabetes...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases