BOLLING v. ELI LILLY AND CO.

Nos. 92-2110, 92-2684.

990 F.2d 1028 (1993)

Ernest M. BOLLING, Appellee, v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY; Employee Benefits Committee, Appellants. Ernest M. BOLLING, Appellant, v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY; Employee Benefits Committee, Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Decided April 7, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Larry Michael Schumaker (argued), Kansas City, MO, for appellant.

H. Kent Desselle argued (Pamela J. Taylor and H. Kent Desselle on brief), Independence, MO, for appellees.

Before FAGG, Circuit Judge, BRIGHT, Senior Circuit Judge, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.


FAGG, Circuit Judge.

Former employee Ernest M. Bolling requested benefits under Eli Lilly and Company's (Eli Lilly) extended disability benefits plan. Bolling asserted he resigned in 1984 because he was disabled from working because of depression and other mental problems caused by a 1983 work-related head injury. Finding there was insufficient evidence to show Bolling was disabled when he resigned, the Employee Benefits...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases