YNIQUES v. CABRAL

No. 91-15865.

985 F.2d 1031 (1993)

Gilbert YNIQUES; Angel Diaz; Carl S. Ramos; John Balderama; Tony L. Hernandez, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Victor G. CABRAL; Mario G. Obledo, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided February 16, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Henry D. Nunez, Fresno, CA, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Douglas B. Lange and Kenneth L. Moes, Archbald & Spray, Santa Barbara, CA, for defendants-appellees.

Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, and SCHROEDER and POOLE, Circuit Judges.


POOLE, Circuit Judge:

The district court dismissed plaintiff Gilbert Yniques' lawsuit after defendant Victor Cabral removed the case from state court and Yniques joined Cabral's law partner as a defendant, and subsequently declined to reconsider its order. Yniques argues that 28 U.S.C. § 1447(e) requires a district court to remand a complaint to state court where the plaintiff has joined a non-diverse defendant to the action. We have jurisdiction pursuant to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases