1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 850 P.2d
  5. 850 P.2d 1154 (1993)
 

FEDERATION OF OR. PAROLE v. DEPT. OF CORR.

UP-51-91; CA A75823.

850 P.2d 1154 (1993)

119 Or. App. 355

FEDERATION OF OREGON PAROLE AND PROBATION OFFICERS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Oregon, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and Multnomah County, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided April 21, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daryl S. Garrettson, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Aitchison, Hoag, Vick & Tarantino, Portland.

Richard D. Wasserman, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent State of Oregon. With him on the brief were Charles S. Crookham, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Jacqueline A. Weber, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent Multnomah County.

Before DEITS, P.J., and RIGGS and DURHAM, JJ.

RIGGS, Judge.

Federation of Oregon Parole and Probation Officers (FOPPO) seeks review of an order of the Employment Relations Board (ERB). The order found that respondents had not committed an unfair labor practice by refusing to bargain over the decision or the impact of the decision to transfer a group of probation and parole officers from employment with the State of Oregon to employment with Multnomah County pursuant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases