STATE v. TETUKEVICH

CR91-0183; CA A71300.

855 P.2d 1137 (1993)

121 Or. App. 449

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. David TETUKEVICH, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided July 7, 1993.

Reconsideration Denied September 15, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dan Maloney, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, Salem.

John R. Payne, Certified Law Student, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Charles S. Crookham, Atty. Gen., Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., and Douglas F. Zier, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem.

Before RICHARDSON, C.J., and DEITS and DURHAM, JJ.


RICHARDSON, Chief Judge.

Defendant appeals his conviction for theft in the second degree. ORS 164.045. He contends that the trial court erred by denying his motion for mistrial and by sentencing him to jail as a condition of probation under ORS 137.540(2). We affirm the conviction but remand for resentencing.

In the first assignment, defendant argues that a mistrial was required because the prosecutor commented on his failure to explain his actions when he...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases