PER CURIAM.
Finding no merit to appellant's first two points on appeal, we affirm. As to point three, we note that the order of the trial court rendered January 8, 1993, which specifically finds appellant failed to satisfy his burden of proof that he does not have the financial ability to pay the purge amounts previously set, moots this third point on appeal.
GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and DELL and STONE...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
