1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 842 F.Supp.
  5. 842 F.Supp. 1128 (1993)
 

HARDIMAN v. HARTLEY

No. S92-337.

842 F.Supp. 1128 (1993)

Maurice D. HARDIMAN, Plaintiff, v. William HARTLEY, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, South Bend Division.

November 30, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Maurice D. Hardiman, pro se.

Wayne E. Uhl, Office of Indiana Atty. Gen., Indianapolis, IN, for defendants.

ORDER

MILLER, District Judge.

No objection having been filed to the magistrate's report and recommendation filed on October 19, the court now ADOPTS the report and recommendation and directs that judgment be entered for the defendants and against the plaintiff.

SO ORDERED.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

PIERCE, United States Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiff, Maurice D. Hardiman, a former inmate at the Indiana State Prison...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases