NORTH RIVER INS. v. PHILADELPHIA REINSURANCE CORP.

Civ. A. No. 91-1323(WGB).

831 F.Supp. 1132 (1993)

The NORTH RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. PHILADELPHIA REINSURANCE CORPORATION and CIGNA Reinsurance Company, successor to INA Reinsurance Company, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey.

September 20, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

McElroy, Deutsch & Mulvaney by Vincent E. Reilly, Morristown, NJ, Simpson, Thatcher & Bartlett by Mary Kay Vyskocil, Joseph Wayland, Brian G. Snover, Robert R. Pollowitz, New York City, for plaintiff.

White & Williams by Thomas A. Allen, Ellen K. Burrows, William E. Cox, Marion R. Hubing, Westmont, NJ, for defendant, CIGNA Reinsurance Co.


OPINION

BASSLER, District Judge:

The plaintiff, The North River Insurance Co., ["North River"] and the defendant, CIGNA Reinsurance Co., ["CIGNA Re"] make cross motions for summary judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. For the following reasons, the Court grants CIGNA Re's motion for summary judgment and denies North River's summary judgment motion.

I. BACKGROUND

These summary judgment motions concern whether a reinsurer, CIGNA Re, must reimburse...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases