1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 998 F.2d
  5. 998 F.2d 963 (1993)
 

DAVIS v. LOESCH

No. 92-1231.

998 F.2d 963 (1993)

Warren E. DAVIS and Donald W. Granger, Appellants, v. Stanley B. LOESCH, James C. St. John, and Danny K. Mints, Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

July 9, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Penrose Lucas Albright, Mason, Mason & Albright, Arlington, VA, argued for appellants.

Donald R. Dunner, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, Washington, DC, argued for appellees. With him on the brief were Allen M. Sokal and Richard L. Stroup. Also on the brief were Lucian Wayne Beavers, Clifford C. Dougherty, III, Laney, Dougherty, Hessin & Beavers, Oklahoma City, OK and James R. Duzan, Halliburton Services, Duncan, OK, of counsel.

Before PLAGER and SCHALL, Circuit Judges, and CURTIN, Senior District Judge.

SCHALL, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 141 (1988), from a decision of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (Board) of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) in an interference. The interference was between, on the one hand, the continuation application of joint inventors Stanley B. Loesch, James C. St. John, and Danny K. Mints (sometimes collectively, "Loesch")1 and, on the other hand...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases