U.S. v. SANDSNESS

No. 92-30131.

988 F.2d 970 (1993)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael James SANDSNESS, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided March 10, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert J. McCrea, McCrea P.C., Eugene, OR, for defendant-appellant.

James L. Sutherland, Asst. U.S. Atty., Eugene, OR, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before: BEEZER, NOONAN and TROTT, Circuit Judges.


BEEZER, Circuit Judge:

Michael Sandsness appeals his sentence for selling drug paraphernalia in interstate commerce. He claims that 21 U.S.C. § 857 (1988) (now 21 U.S.C. § 863 (1992)), the statute defining the crime to which he pleaded guilty, is vague and overbroad. He also claims that the sentencing judge erred in enhancing his sentence for his managerial role in the offense because the statute is vague as applied with respect to other sales to which he...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases