PER CURIAM.
The appellants challenge an order in which the court retroactively reduced the appellee's child support obligation. This order was entered despite the appellants' assertion that they desired the opportunity to present further evidence and that the court was exceeding the announced scope of the hearing. Because the hearing was held upon motion and notice addressed to the appellee's contempt of court for failing to comply with the existing
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.