PER CURIAM.
In this appeal, the ex-husband argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion under rule 1.540(b) for partial relief from final judgment of dissolution of marriage. We affirm.
The ex-husband mainly argues that the exwife committed a fraud on the issue of paternity. We do not agree because our review of the record convinces us that while the dissolution proceeding was still pending, he already had doubts over whether he was the father of...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
