1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 995 F.2d
  5. 995 F.2d 948 (1993)
 

ALPINE RIDGE GROUP v. CISNEROS

Nos. 91-35573, 91-55354 and 91-35267.

995 F.2d 948 (1993)

ALPINE RIDGE GROUP, a partnership; Monroe Associates, a limited partnership; Brentwood, a limited partnership; Campbell Courts Associates, a partnership; Cheney Gardens Limited Partnership, a limited partnership, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Henry G. CISNEROS, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Urban Development; U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Defendants-Appellants. ACACIA VILLA; Alicia Park Apartments; Amerige Villa; Antelope Valley, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Henry G. CISNEROS, Sec. HUD; United States of America, Defendants-Appellants. ALPINE RIDGE GROUP, a partnership; Monroe Associates, a limited partnership; Brentwood, a limited partnership; Campbell Courts Associates, a partnership; Cheney Gardens Limited Partnership, a limited partnership, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, and Bitterroot Manor, a limited partnership, et al., Plaintiffs-Intervenors, v. Henry G. CISNEROS, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Urban Development; U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

June 25, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Douglas Letter, Civil Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, for defendants-appellants.

Warren J. Daheim, Gordon, Thomas, Honeywell, Malanca, Peterson & Daheim, Tacoma, WA, Henry A. Hubschman, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson, Washington, DC, for plaintiffs-appellees.

Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The mandate of the United States Supreme Court certified on June 2, 1993, in Cisneros v. Alpine Ridge, ___ U.S. ___, 113 S.Ct. 1898, 123 L.Ed.2d 572 reversed the judgment of this court. Therefore, we vacate our opinion at 955 F.2d 1382 (9th Cir.1992), reverse the district court, and remand to the district court for further proceedings which are consistent with the opinion of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases