DELEHANT v. BOARD ON POLICE STANDARDS

CA A65552; SC S39796.

855 P.2d 1088 (1993)

317 Or. 273

Robert Anthony DELEHANT, Petitioner on Review, v. BOARD ON POLICE STANDARDS AND TRAINING, Respondent on Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided August 5, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

W.D. Cramer, Jr., of Cramer & Mallon, Burns, argued the cause and filed the petition for petitioner on review.

Robert M. Atkinson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause and filed the response for respondent on review. With him on the response were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.


GILLETTE, Justice.

This is a judicial review of a contested case decided by the state agency that was known as the Board on Police Standards and Training ("BPST").1 BPST denied petitioner's application for a basic police certificate on the ground that he previously had been convicted of several crimes in Idaho. The Court of Appeals, with one judge dissenting, affirmed the order of BPST. Delehant v. Board on Police Standards,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases