1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 840 F.Supp.
  5. 840 F.Supp. 1103 (1993)
 

ARKANSAS RIVER CO. v. U.S.

Civ. A. No. GC-90-CV-240.

840 F.Supp. 1103 (1993)

In the Matter of the Complaint of ARKANSAS RIVER COMPANY, a corporation, as operator and/or owner pro hac vice of the M/V Greenville, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Greenville Division.

October 13, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ernest Lane III, William R. Striebeck, Greenville, MS, for Arkansas River Co.

Peter F. Frost, Dept. of Justice, Torts Branch, Civ. Div., Washington, DC, Jim Greenlee, Asst. U.S. Atty., Oxford, MS, for U.S.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

DAVIDSON, District Judge.

Defendant, United States of America, has filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Rule 12(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Despite the fact that the government has moved for judgment on the pleadings, it has attached exhibits and affidavits which it advances in support of its motion. Likewise, Arkansas River Company, plaintiff, calls...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases