1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 839 F.Supp.
  5. 839 F.Supp. 1094 (1993)
 

MUZZLEMAN v. NATIONAL RAIL PASSENGER CORP.

Civ. A. No. 92-355 MMS.

839 F.Supp. 1094 (1993)

Mark MUZZLEMAN, Plaintiff, v. NATIONAL RAIL PASSENGER CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

December 13, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen B. Potter, Potter, Crosse & Leonard, P.A., Wilmington, DE (Robert N. Peirce, Jr., Robert Peirce & Associates, P.A., Pittsburgh, PA, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Somers S. Price, Potter Anderson & Corroon, Wilmington, DE, for defendant.

OPINION

MURRAY M. SCHWARTZ, Senior District Judge.

Plaintiff, Mark Muzzleman, has filed suit pursuant to the Federal Employers' Liability Act ["FELA"], 45 U.S.C. § 51 et seq., against the National Rail Passenger Corporation ["Amtrak"] to recover for physical injuries sustained while employed by Amtrak. Presently before the Court are various pretrial issues which the parties have been unable to resolve.

I. ADMISSIBILITY OF MEDICAL BILLS...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases