1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 984 F.2d
  5. 984 F.2d 948 (1993)
 

McMASTER v. PUNG

No. 92-1625.

984 F.2d 948 (1993)

Gregory J. McMASTER, Appellant, v. Orville PUNG, Commissioner, Minnesota Department of Corrections; Frank W. Wood, Warden, Minnesota Correctional Facility — Oak Park Heights; David Crist, Assistant to the Warden, Minnesota Correctional Facility — Oak Park Heights; Dennis Benson, Associate Warden, Minnesota Correctional Facility — Oak Park Heights; Richard Hagelberger, Due Process Prosecutor, Minnesota Correctional Facility — Oak Park Heights; Sheila Johnson, Officer, Minnesota Correctional Facility — Oak Park Heights; Harold Hansen, Hearing Officer, Minnesota Department of Corrections; James Ryan, Hearing Officer, Minnesota Department of Corrections; Mike Green, Caseworker, Minnesota Correctional Facility — Oak Park Heights; Steve Lydon, Head of Internal Affairs, Minnesota Correctional Facility — Oak Park Heights; Penny Karasch, Mail Room Supervisor, Minnesota Correctional Facility — Oak Park Heights, in their individual and official capacities, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Decided January 29, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jack S. Nordby, Minneapolis, MN, argued (John R. Wylde, on brief), for appellant.

M. Jacqueline Regis, St. Paul, MN, argued (Hubert H. Humphrey, III, on brief), for appellees.

Before McMILLIAN and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges, and BENSON, Senior District Judge.

McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge.

Gregory J. McMaster appeals from a final order entered in the District Court1 for the District of Minnesota granting summary judgment in favor of Minnesota Department of Corrections officials in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action. McMaster v. Pung, No. 4-91-236 (D.Minn. Feb. 24, 1992) (order). Appellant alleged violations of his constitutional rights to due process, assistance of counsel and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases