1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 848 P.2d
  5. 848 P.2d 1079 (1993)
 

HINKLE, COX, ET AL. v. CADLE CO.

No. 20332.

848 P.2d 1079 (1993)

115 N.M. 152

HINKLE, COX, EATON, COFFIELD & HENSLEY, a partnership, Plaintiff-Appellee, and Cross-Appellant, v. CADLE COMPANY OF OHIO, INC., Defendant-Appellant, and Cross-Appellee.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

February 23, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cynthia A. Fry, Albuquerque, for appellant.

Hinkle, Cox, Eaton, Coffield & Hensley, Stuart D. Shanor and Gregory S. Wheeler, Roswell, for appellee.

OPINION

MONTGOMERY, Justice.

This is an appeal and a cross-appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, a law firm, awarding it the amount sought in its complaint as fees allegedly earned in representing the defendant over a period of time (plus prejudgment interest, costs, and attorney's fees), and dismissing the defendant's counterclaims. Defendant, Cadle Company of Ohio, Inc. ("Cadle"),1 challenges the trial court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases