FELDSPAR CORP. v. U.S.

Court No. 92-07-00425-S.

825 F.Supp. 1095 (1993)

The FELDSPAR CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and Unimin Corporation, Defendant-Intervenor.

United States Court of International Trade.

June 23, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Crowell & Moring, Barry E. Cohen and M. Roy Goldberg, Washington, DC, for plaintiff.

Office of Gen. Counsel, U.S. Intern. Trade Com'n, Lyn M. Schlitt, Gen. Counsel, James A. Toupin, Asst. Gen. Counsel and Robin L. Turner, Washington, DC, for defendant.

Unimin Corp., Andrew G. Bradley, New Canaan, CT, for defendant-intervenor.


OPINION AND JUDGMENT

CARMAN, Judge:

Pursuant to Rule 56.1 plaintiff moves for judgment upon the agency record. Plaintiff contests the final negative antidumping determination of the International Trade Commission, in its investigation in Nepheline Syenite from Canada, 57 Fed.Reg. 19,439 (1992). This action is brought pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1516(a) (1988) and 28 U.S.C. § 1581(c) (1988).

The U.S.-Canada Free Trade Agreement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases