U.S. v. DADDATO

No. 92-3750.

996 F.2d 903 (1993)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James DADDATO, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided June 17, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Matthew L. Jacobs, Asst. U.S. Atty., Lynne M. Solien (argued), Milwaukee, WI, for plaintiff-appellee.

Laurence M. Moon, Whitefish Bay, WI (argued), for defendant-appellant.

Before BAUER, Chief Judge, and POSNER and ROVNER, Circuit Judges.


POSNER, Circuit Judge.

This appeal presents a question on which there are no reported cases: whether a judge may impose a condition in the nature of restitution on a sentence of supervised release, even if the Victim and Witness Protection Act of 1982, 18 U.S.C. §§ 3663-64, would not authorize the type of restitution ordered for the defendant's crime.

Pursuant to his plea of guilty, James Daddato was convicted of the federal crime of selling hallucinogenic...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases