The PEOPLE ex rel. Jack O'MALLEY et al., Petitioners-Appellants,
v.
ILLINOIS COMMERCE COMMISSION et al., Respondents-Appellees.
Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
January 6, 1993.
January 6, 1993.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Thomas H. Rowland (argued), Asst. State's Atty, Robert K. Lock, Supervisor, Judith A. Mondello and Marie D. Spicuzza, Asst. State's Attys., Robert W. Cushing, Asst. Atty. Gen., Chief, Public Utilities Div., Chicago, for the People of Cook County ex rel.
Jean M. Roche, Jean M. Roche and Associates, Oak Lawn, William F. Cottrell, Asst. Atty. Gen., Bernard Rane, Asst. Corp. Counsel, Allen W. Cherry, Legal Assistance Foundation of Chicago 91017, Kelly R. Welsh, Corp. Counsel, City of Chicago, Chicago, Jean M. Roche, for Citizens Utility Bd.
Louise A. Sunderland, (argued), Edward A. Butts, Lincoln V. Janus, Ill. Bell Telephone Co., Kathleen Nolan, Public Counsel of Illinois, Douglas W. Trabaris, Chicago, for Illinois Bell Telephone Co.
Karen Lusson, Susan L. Satter, Citizens Utility Bd., Allen W. Cherry, Legal Assistance Foundation of Chicago 91017, Bernard Rane, Asst. Corp. Counsel, Michael W. Ward (argued), Henry T. Kelly, O'Keefee, Ashenden, Lyons & Ward, Chicago, Dennis K. Muncy, Meyer, Capel, Hirschfeld, Muncy, Jahn & Aldeen, Champaign, Cynthia Scheiber, Officer Public Counsel, Springfield, Richard R. Zukowski, Zukowski, Rogers, Flood & McArdle, John C. Gockley, Chicago, Jean Roche, Jean M. Roche and Associates, Oak Lawn, Stanley M. Lipnick, Arnstein & Lehr, Chicago, John P. Kelliher, Darrell S. Townsley (argued), David W. McGann, Special Asst. Attys. Gen., William F. Cottrell, Asst. Atty. Gen., Illinois Commerce Com'n, Gen. Counsel, Chicago, Illinois Commerce Com'n, Rose Claggett, Chief Clerk, Springfield, for Illinois Commerce Com'n.
Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District.
Justice BOWMAN delivered the opinion of the court:
The parties come before us for the second time in this matter of administrative review of a filing by respondent, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (Bell or Company), with the Illinois Commerce Commission (Commission). The filing sought new and restructured telephone rates. The petitioners, who were intervenors in the proceedings before the Commission, consist of consumers and Bell's competitors. They seek review of...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
