SAIF CORPORATION v. ATCHLEY

91-05626; CA A76029.

861 P.2d 1024 (1993)

124 Or. App. 201

In the Matter of the Compensation of Deborah K. Atchley, Claimant. SAIF CORPORATION and Centennial Medical, Petitioners, v. Deborah K. ATCHLEY, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided October 20, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David L. Runner, Asst. Atty. Gen., argued the cause for petitioners. On the brief were Charles S. Crookham, Atty. Gen., Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., and Julie K. Bolt, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen.

Edward J. Harri, Eugene, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Malagon, Moore, Johnson, Jensen & Correll.

Before ROSSMAN, P.J., and De MUNIZ and LEESON, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

Reversed as to attorney fees under ORS 656.386(1). SAIF v. Allen, 124 Or.App. 183, 861 P.2d 1018 (decided this date). Affirmed as to penalty under ORS 656.262(10).

De MUNIZ, J., concurs and files opinion.

ROSSMAN, P.J., dissents and files opinion.

De MUNIZ, Judge, concurring.

I agree with the majority...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases