REISS v. U.S.

No. 92-1226.

983 F.2d 899 (1993)

Richard REISS, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Decided January 14, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Neal Shapiro, Minneapolis, MN, argued, for appellant.

Christine Grant, Washington, DC, argued (James A. Bruton, Gary R. Allen and Robert S. Pomerance, on the brief), for appellee.

Before JOHN R. GIBSON and MAGILL, Circuit Judges, and VAN SICKLE, Senior District Judge.


VAN SICKLE, Senior District Judge.

Richard Reiss appeals from the action of the district court1 granting the motion of the IRS for a Rule 12 dismissal of his action seeking a refund of penalties. We affirm.

Reiss was an income tax preparer as defined in 26 U.S.C. § 7701(a)(36). After auditing a number of Reiss' clients' returns, the IRS determined that Reiss had willfully or negligently...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases