OREGONIANS IN ACTION v. LCDC

(91-RA-809; CA A73503 (Control), CA A73666).

854 P.2d 1010 (1993)

121 Or. App. 497

OREGONIANS IN ACTION, Petitioner, and Yamhill County, Petitioner-Cross-Respondent, v. LAND CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION, Respondent-Cross-Respondent, and 1000 Friends of Oregon and Mark Huff, Respondents-Cross-Petitioners.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided July 7, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David B. Smith, Tigard, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner.

John C. Pinkstaff, Asst. Yamhill County Counsel, McMinnville, argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioner—cross-respondent.

John T. Bagg, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent—cross-respondent. With him on the brief were Charles S. Crookham, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

F. Blair Batson, Portland, argued the cause and filed the briefs for respondents—cross-petitioners.

Before DEITS, P.J., and RIGGS and DURHAM, JJ.


DEITS, Presiding Judge.

1000 Friends of Oregon and Mark Huff (collectively "1000 Friends"), Yamhill County and Oregonians in Action (OIA) seek review of LCDC's periodic review order, which required the county to amend its comprehensive plan and land use regulations. We affirm.

The specific requirements of the LCDC order, and of the report of the Director of the Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases