Defendant's motion to strike the state's brief is denied. On the merits, defendant raises a constitutional vagueness challenge directed at the traffic infraction of "failure to wear approved headgear." ORS 814.269; ORS 815.050. Assuming, without deciding, that such a challenge is appropriate in a case not involving penal sanctions, we conclude that the laws cited by defendant are not unconstitutionally vague...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
