1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 838 F.Supp.
  5. 838 F.Supp. 1021 (1993)
 

FARRA v. STANLEY-BOSTITCH, INC.

Civ. A. No. 92-995.

838 F.Supp. 1021 (1993)

Gerard FARRA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. STANLEY-BOSTITCH, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

As Modified December 9, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George F. Schoener, Jr., M. Mark Mendel, Ltd., Philadelphia, PA, for plaintiffs.

John P. Penders, Charles W. Craven, Juliana M. Petito, Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman and Goggin, Philadelphia, PA, for defendant.

MEMORANDUM

ROBRENO, District Judge.

In this product liability case, the jury returned a verdict in favor of defendant. Plaintiffs have filed a motion for judgment as a matter of law or, in the alternative, a new trial. For the following reasons, plaintiffs' motion will be denied.

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Gerard Farra ("Farra") is the owner and operator of a roofing business. While installing a roof on a residence, Farra

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases