PER CURIAM.
We affirm appellant's sentences, except we reverse the imposition of the consecutive mandatory minimum sentences and remand for resentencing in accordance with this opinion. Because appellant's offenses occurred during a single, continuous criminal episode, consecutive mandatory minimum sentences were improper. Palmer v. State,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.