HORTON v. WHITEHILL

9103-01735; CA A73497.

854 P.2d 977 (1993)

121 Or. App. 336

Ray HORTON and Madison Agency, Inc., an Oregon corporation, Appellants—Cross-Respondents, v. Gina WHITEHILL, Respondent—Cross-Appellant, and Madison Agency, Inc., an Oregon corporation, Defendant— Cross-Appellant. MADISON AGENCY, INC., an Oregon corporation, Appellant—Cross-Respondent, v. Gina WHITEHILL, Respondent— Cross-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided June 23, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bert E. Joachims, Portland, argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellants—cross-respondents.

W. Theodore Guthrie, Portland, argued the cause for respondent—cross-appellant Whitehill and cross-appellant Madison Agency, Inc. With him on the brief were Peggy S. Foraker and Pfister & Tripp, P.C., Portland.

Before WARREN, P.J., and EDMONDS and LANDAU, JJ.


EDMONDS, Judge.

Ray Horton, plaintiff, appeals and, Gina Whitehill, defendant, cross-appeals from a judgment1 denying recovery on reciprocal claims of breach of fiduciary duty to Madison Agency, Inc., a corporation. On de novo review, we reverse.

Plaintiff and defendant began working together in 1987 and, in January, 1988, they incorporated as the Madison Agency, Inc. (Madison)...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases