1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 994 F.2d
  5. 994 F.2d 824 (1993)
 

QUAKER STATE OIL REFINING CORP. v. U.S.

No. 92-5162.

994 F.2d 824 (1993)

QUAKER STATE OIL REFINING CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Rehearing Denied; Suggestion for Rehearing Declined August 2, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas D. Arbogast, Reed Smith Shaw & McClay, Pittsburgh, PA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was Carolyn D. Duronio.

Joan I. Oppenheimer, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. With her on the brief were James A. Bruton, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Gary R. Allen and Jonathan S. Cohen, Attys.

Before NIES, Chief Judge, RICH and LOURIE, Circuit Judges.

Rehearing Denied; Suggestion for Rehearing In Banc Declined August 2, 1993.

LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

Quaker State Oil Refining Corporation appeals from the judgment of the United States Claims Court1 granting (1) the government's cross-motion for summary judgment on Quaker State's claim for a refund of "windfall profit" taxes paid on first and second quarter earnings of 1983; (2) the government's cross-motion for summary judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases