HAYNES v. STATE OF OREGON

16-90-02982; CA A67831.

854 P.2d 949 (1993)

121 Or. App. 395

William Arthur HAYNES, Appellant, v. STATE of Oregon, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided June 23, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George W. Kelly, Eugene, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Jonathan H. Fussner, Asst. Atty. Gen., argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Charles S. Crookham, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before DE MUNIZ, P.J., and EDMONDS and LEESON, JJ.


LEESON, Judge.

Petitioner filed an amended petition for post-conviction relief in which he claims that his conviction is void, because his trial counsel's representation was constitutionally inadequate and therefore violated his right to counsel under the state and federal constitutions. ORS 138.530(1)(a). The court denied relief. We reverse and remand.

Petitioner's stepson had been released on parole from MacLaren...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases