AMATO v. MERCURY CASUALTY CO.

Docket No. B063712.

18 Cal.App.4th 1784 (1993)

23 Cal. Rptr.2d 73

ANTHONY CHARLES AMATO et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. MERCURY CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four.

September 29, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Kinkle, Rodiger & Spriggs and Guillermo W. Schnaider for Defendant and Appellant.

Curtis L. Gemmil and Jerry L. Rowley for Plaintiffs and Appellants.


OPINION

WOODS (A.M.), P.J.

Appellant Mercury Casualty Company issued an auto policy which covered a Renault automobile. The policy stated that it did not provide liability coverage for bodily injury sustained by an insured. The policy defined insureds to include permissive users of an owned automobile and resident relatives of permissive users, including those related by marriage. Cross-appellant Anthony Charles Amato negligently...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases