RAE v. KLUSAK

No. 91 C 6239.

810 F.Supp. 983 (1993)

Thomas RAE, Plaintiff, v. David KLUSAK, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D.

January 11, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John P. De Rose, John P. De Rose and Assoc., Burr Ridge, IL, for plaintiff.

Tracey R. Ladner, Amy E. Neuman, John R. Roche, Jr. Assts. Corp. Counsel, Chicago, IL, for defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SHADUR, Senior District Judge.

At this point plaintiff Thomas Rae ("Rae"), by filing his Second Amended Complaint ("SAC"), has made his third attempt to assert claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 ("Section 1983"). After having unsuccessfully resisted the effort of Rae's counsel to present that revised pleading to begin with, defendants have now filed what they label as a motion to dismiss the SAC with prejudice. However, both...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases