BAKER v. BAKER

91-1-369; CA A73068.

845 P.2d 937 (1993)

In the Matter of the MARRIAGE OF Vicky Dawn BAKER, Respondent, and Carl Henry Baker, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided February 17, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William E. Hensley, Oregon City, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Gevurtz, Menashe, Hergert, Larson & Kurshner, PC, Oregon City.

Mary Wilbur Ebel, Clackamas, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief was Kenneth Lee Baker, Clackamas.

Before DEITS, P.J., and RIGGS and DURHAM, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

Husband appeals from a dissolution judgment. He seeks reversal of provisions relating to the valuation of a video rental business, spousal support, the time allowed to pay an equalizing judgment and child support. On de novo review, ORS 19.125(3), we affirm the trial court on the valuation of the video rental business, spousal support, and the time for paying the equalization judgment. However, the trial court erred in calculating the presumed basic...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases