MURDOCK v. STATE

No. 1611-92.

845 S.W.2d 915 (1993)

Randle De Wayne MURDOCK, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc.

Discretionary Review Refused February 3, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dick DeGuerin, Houston, for appellant.

John B. Holmes, Jr., Dist. Atty. and Alan Curry and Casey O'Brien, Asst. Dist. Attys., Houston, Robert Huttash, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.

Before the court en banc.


OPINION ON APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted by a jury of illegal investment and sentenced to twentyfive years confinement and a fine of $300,000.00. The Court of Appeals affirmed. Murdoch v. State, 840 S.W.2d 558 (Tex. App.—Texarkana, 1992).

During the punishment phase, the trial court admitted evidence concerning extraneous conduct which did not result...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases