NEAL v. NEAL

No. 19086.

873 P.2d 881 (1993)

125 Idaho 627

Thomas A. NEAL, Plaintiff-Counterdefendant Respondent, v. Mary NEAL, Defendant-Counterplaintiff-Appellant, and Jill LA GASSE, Counterdefendant-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Idaho.

Review Granted July 30, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marcus, Merrick & Montgomery, Boise, for appellant. Craig Marcus argued.

Ringert, Clark, Chtd; Moffatt, Thomas, Barrett, Rock & Fields, Boise, for respondents. Jeffrey R. Christenson argued for respondent Thomas A. Neal and Kirk R. Helvie argued for respondent Jill LaGasse.


SUBSTITUTE OPINION

The Court's prior opinion, dated April 26, 1993, is hereby withdrawn.

WALTERS, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from an order dismissing a wife's action for damages allegedly suffered as a result of the adulterous relationship between her husband and his mistress. On review, we are asked to decide whether a party has an actionable right to an exclusive sexual relationship with his or her...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases