1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 860 P.2d
  5. 860 P.2d 886 (1993)
 

STATE v. MOYLETT

D890539M; CA A77510.

860 P.2d 886 (1993)

123 Or. App. 600

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Lawrence William MOYLETT, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided October 6, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William Uhle, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Thuemmel & Uhle, Portland.

Thomas H. Denney, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before ROSSMAN, P.J., and De MUNIZ and LEESON, JJ.

LEESON, Judge.

Defendant appeals his convictions for assault in the fourth degree and criminal mischief in the second degree. ORS 163.160; ORS 164.354. The issue is whether the trial court erred by denying defendant's motion to dismiss the charges for lack of a speedy trial. We hold that it did not.

The underlying facts are not in dispute, and are fully explained in State v. Moylett, 101 Or.App. 86,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases