STATE v. HICKS

91-04-31803; CA A73694.

852 P.2d 894 (1993)

120 Or. App. 345

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Jalango Abell HICKS, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided May 19, 1993.

Reconsideration Denied August 11, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hari Nam S. Khalsa, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender.

Jonathan H. Fussner, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Atty. Gen., Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., and Bob Graves, Certified Law Student.

Before WARREN, P.J., and ROSSMAN and EDMONDS, JJ.


ROSSMAN, Judge.

After a jury trial, defendant was convicted of riot, ORS 166.015(1), and assault in the second degree. ORS 163.175. On appeal, he seeks reversal of the riot conviction, contending that there was insufficient evidence to convict him. We affirm.

The crime of riot is defined in ORS 166.015:

"(1) A person commits the crime of riot if while participating with five or more other persons the person engages in tumultuous and violent conduct...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases