HAYWOOD v. HAYWOOD

(89-492-D-3; CA A72623).

852 P.2d 891 (1993)

120 Or. App. 339

In the Matter of the MARRIAGE OF Connie J. HAYWOOD, Respondent, and William R. Haywood, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided May 19, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas C. Howser, Ashland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Howser & Munsell, P.C., Ashland.

William P. Haberlach, Medford, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.

Before ROSSMAN, P.J., and De MUNIZ and LEESON, JJ.


ROSSMAN, Presiding Judge.

Husband appeals from an order reducing, but not terminating, wife's spousal support. We review de novo, ORS 19.125(3), and terminate spousal support.

The 1990 dissolution of this 29-year marriage awarded wife $750 per month in spousal support until April, 1993, and $500 per month thereafter until July, 2003. At that time, wife's net1 income was approximately...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases